Impression of a man who is angry twelve 12angrymen

I saw a movie with a very famous 12 Angry Men comic cafe in 12 angry men in Higashi-Osaka Ishikiri. Is completely news to me, in black and white film in 1957. I wrote a very interesting and also by means of the impression.
Jury system is a story of a boy to talk about America is from the old days, people were selected to the jury that a person has committed a murder.
It begins with a rueful eye movie of the 17-year-old boy. That you stand on suspicion of the murder of a father with a knife.

Discussion boy or innocence is determined by a unanimous death penalty. Because they are life and death in humans. But jurors do not come back until the end of that discussion.
You also have end-stage every day. Comes impatient.
Begins with a discussion that there are people who say that only a guilty guilty Even though it was all there. Is rolling up spoiler.

Society of men who were chosen 12 people on a jury is like theater stage with a different character each, discuss it behind closed doors in one room from beginning to end.
While it is bad nice place, respectively, the process is very interesting but he also punch line properly settled through dialogue so Yappari human society.

Viewers about the case from the story of a man that is from the knowledge of 0, to the discussion, scene, situation, testimony comes into the viewer's head at all.
Come and say well you know a man who pleaded not guilty to doubt that it can not doubt what nobody is too suspicious to prosecutors why it is also a lawyer.

[Free Shipping] angry man that twelve

What happened in the slums. Impression of many people living in slums crime.
Slum is often the case too, the number of processing may have a suitable handle many police. Might have been exhausted.
The trial was carried out easily and will not just simply killed the father the child was born in the slums so this time.
Had been in the fatigue of a long period of time I hot jury trial. Was filled with the feeling I want to go back soon to end. But, as says the man who pleaded not guilty, to the death penalty goes too fast to notice that there is no basis of evidence of guilt.

Discrepancies and questioned, disadvantage in the field.
Why did not notice and it is questionable why the police?

There is no evidence to find guilt and doubt.
I doubt that we can be guilty of the boy why he is born then.
Evidence of guilt is required for the crime.
Innocence can not be proven to be a crime.
Story that in accordance with the principle that doubt is not punished.
(. But in Japan seems certain to reason that it can not prove there is no evidence from the crime even if it not)

I think I always though he thinks a long time, but that adult when many were gathered together and wanted to stop by, it is instinct is human society that it must be created to do something.
Or was it money, are produced in various forms or something was the result of a discussion.

I think it is the underlying, it is the moral minimum.

That are included in the jury of 12 people to selfish people are doing is gambling with people who live in ignorance, such as Tora-san in this movie, the president of the company.
Is either being outcasts from the discussion of this 12 man.
It is not gambling, but selfish human beings.

I thought any moment before the introduction Innovation cast from the movie ends.
The moment he moved desks and chairs softening, chair had become vacant one.
If you look after it, who it seems was made to leave the middle is selfish.
Author of this movie seems to have complained in the picture, selfish people that do not need to discuss it from the beginning.

I also have selfish reasons for bad do not write anymore about it because I wrote an article about.

The boy would probably have killed the father.
(Was not able to prove that killing) method based on the principle of innocent until proven that they can not be put to death without that evidence is insufficient punishment, jurors concluded that it was simply a boy but acquitted.
Have exposed the inadequacy of the evidence that the police can not punish someone do not know I can find criminals.
In 1957 is not already known to the Japanese problem jurors worry now, we is not have to leave now even if you can not resolve it in 2011.
(Or effort, but genetic testing has been Well, in the sense that in theory)

Hen sore ahead of the old movie and I do not think, let me see was very fun.
Last issue is broken, it was logical sentence could disappear, so I published as head of its extent!